A Brief Overview of the Astrological Work of Cyril Fagan
by Ken Bowser
The main point at issue in contemporary
astrology devolves onto the zodiac itself; whether trait characteristics
derive from the signs or the actual constellations in the sky. The entire
controversy is the consequence of the work of Cyril Fagan (1896 - 1970),
astrologer extraordinary, and beyond question be best Irish astrologer
of his day, perhaps any day. He is not well known in Ireland because
the bulk of his most important work was published in American magazines,
as were was a strong opposition to his work in similar English publications.
So, as with the Great Famine, America was the beneficiary of Irish talent.
While he encountered some stateside opposition (Dell horoscope will
still not print any sidereal article), in general, the American love
fair with the Irish caused his work to be examined by most, and embraced
by some, while the entire subject was re-invigorated. In fairness, it
should be said that he and Charles E.O. Carter (1887 - 1960), the best
English astrologer of his day, were close friends, and several other
prominent English astrologers held Fagan in high regard.
Cyril was born in Dublin, May 22nd 1896
at noon, Dunsink Time. The local mean time of the Dunsink Observatory
was the time standard then in the area. It is 25' 21" seconds slow
of Greenwich, so that noon Dunsink Time is equivalent to 12:25:21 GMT.
In a letter to Arthur Blackwell, the brightest light of the second generation
of modern siderealists, dated February 20th 1963, Fagan wrote, ''My
mother repeatedly informed me that l was born at 12 o'clock noon. She
said she remembered the occasion well, as my father, in his tall silk
hat and frock coat came into the room at that moment". Fagan's
father was a medical doctor, a field into which Cyril could not go due
to near deafness resulting from contracting scarlet fever as a child. When Cuneiform script was deciphered in the nineteenth century, Babylonian astronomical/ astrological materials became available to scholars who laboriously translated and published them beginning in the 1880's. Early on it was realised by three German Jesuit scholars, Joseph Epping (1835 - 1894), Franz Xavier Kugler (1862 - 1929) and Johann Nepomuk Strassmeier (1846- 1920), that Babylonian ephemerides were reckoned from stars, not the equinox. The bulk of Babylonian astronomical/astrological translations and commentary appeared in an irregular but massive journal begun by Kugler, Sternkunde Und Sterndiest In Babel (Starlore and Starwork in Babylon) from 1907 until completed in 1935 by Joseph Schaumberger S.J. Almost surely Fagan read at least some of this work but it is not known when he began to unvestigate this sort of material, although his study of it must have been well underway by the 1940's because by 1944 he was confident that the entire Babylonian tradition was sidereal, not simply the Hellenistic period material. He has subsequently been borne out, although there is not enough evidence extant to tell just when the transition to a twelve-fold equal division occurred. It is established that during the second millennium B.C. the Babylonians used seventeen unequal sidereal constellation: the twelve we use now but with Pisces split into two, the eastern and western fishes as well as Orion, Auriga, Perseus and the Pleiades. The earliest horoscope for an individual dates only to 410 BC. It is twelve-fold, sidereal and Babylonian. There are no tropical horoscopes extant anywhere until the Christian era, very likely because they never existed before then. Conversely, there were no sidereal astrologers in be west before Fagan's apostasy which was compelled by evidence. Most of us think of the first degree
of Aries as the first day of Spring, although in the southern hemisphere
it is the first day of Autumn. Presently the background of stars on
which the sun is overlaid, on March 21st is in the constellation Pisces.
That fact is totally discounted by the advocates of the topical school,
who contend that astrological influence, whether causal or symbolic,
derives from equal length signs reckoned from the first point of Aries,
but which relationship with the equinox is now in name only. What Fagan
realised was that the Babylonians did not regard the sidereal signs
as simply a way of measuring things in the sky. Their astrology was
anchored to the stars, not the equinoxes that move a degree of arc every
seventy two years in relation to the stars. In 380 years when the Age
of Aquarius opens, the displacement between the signs and the constellations
will be fully 30 degrees. The mechanism that is central to understanding
the difference between the tropical and sidereal zodiacs, and what the
astrological ages are about, is one of the earth's orbital motons: precession.
If a torque is applied to a rotating body, especially one that is not
uniformly dense, that body will respond at right angles to the applied
torque and begin to precess about its spin axis if the torque is great
enough. A good illustration is a child's spinning top as it begins to
spin down to a stop. It will start to wobble at a rate far slower than
its spin rate, but as the wobble becomes a larger component in total
motion of the top, the wobble becomes bigger as the spin becomes slower.
Gravity will nibble away at the slight imperfection in the top's spin,
hence the low point in the top's spin gets pulled down toward the surface
on which it spins. The top's resistance to being pulled down is what
precession looks like; it's the wobble. A good way to actually feel
the resistance to an applied torque on a rotating body is to hold a
spinning gyroscope, another common toy. As you hold it and turn your
wrist as it spins, you will experience what happens to the Earth in
the large. The torque applied on the Earth is the gravitational attraction
of the sun and moon to the earth's equatorial bulge, which attraction,
unresisted, would pull the equatorial bulge into the plane of the earth's
orbit. Because the earth is massive and spinning, its reaction is at
right angles to the applied torque: it precesses about its spin axis
describing a cone. The outside date for Ptlemy's death
is assumed to be 180 AD. In 720 years, the vernal equinox will display
a section of sky ten degrees to the west of its earlier position regardless
of the calendar convention, due to precession. So by 900 A.D. the equinox
held 21° Pisces (exact alignment of the tropical and sidereal was
in 221 A.D., so ten degrees displacement between them occurred approximately
in 940 A.D.) But the Almagest was not even translated into Latin until
1160. There was nobody in the west to contest Ptolemy's claim that the
beginning of Aries and the vernal equinox were coincident. The Arabs
took note of the discrepancy but did not take issue with the tradition.
By the middle of the seventeenth century A.D. the equinox held 10°
Pisces; by 2376 A.D. the constellation Aquarius will begin to rise at
the vernal equinox. 11,000 years later the tropical zodiac will be completely
upside down with respect to the constellations. Ptolemy's argument is
predicated on the assumption that the earth is fixed in space and that
the sky is moving in relation to it. Discounting the proper motion of
the stars themselves, which is virtually nil during the entire historical
era of western civilisation, the reverse is true, ie. the earth is moving
with respect to be sky, due mainly to the effects of precession. In 1949, Fagan made what many consider his greatest discovery. There is a tradition in astrology about certain parts of the zodiac, called the exaltations, that have special significance for particular planets. Already in Ptolemy's time their origin was lost. There are certain degrees associated with these places as well. The exaltation of the Sun is 19° Aries, the Moon is exalted in 3° Taurus, Mercury in 15° Virgo, Venus in 27° Pisces, Mars in 28° Capricorn, Jupiter in 15° Cancer and Saturn in 21° Libra. These places represent the optimal positions for the expression of the intrinsic natures of the respective planets. Fagan discovered that these positions are the heliacal phenomena for the planets Mercury, Mars, Saturn and Jupiter for the parallel through Babylon for the lunar year 786 - 785 B.C.; the Sun. Moon and Venus degrees are the positions at the first of Nisan, the first Babylonian month, April 3rd, 786 B.C. Julian at Moonset. These positions were not duplicated either tropically or sidereally during the first or second millennium B.C. The exaltations represent the ''hiding places'', i.e. the places where planets appear for the first time after having been invisible for weeks or months, or their longitudes at last appearance before becoming invisible. Horizon phenomena were more important to the Babylonian the meridian transits. The longitudes for the exaltation solution are purelysidereal and make no sense in a tropical context. Ptolemy stated that the earliest astronomical records available to him were from the era (first regnal year) of the Babylonian king Nabonasser: 747 B.C. Good astronomical data don't appear ex nihilo. The records from 747 B.C. suggest an established tradition to which the exaltation solution, only thirty nine years earlier, lends support. Fagan's first book Zodiacs Old and New
was published in 1950 which recounts the exaltation solution among other
things. Naturally it was anathema to the tropical school which unofficially
closed ranks tighter against the Irish heretic, although Cyril was made
a fellow of the American Federation of Astrologers in 1948. He had published
a few articles in American Astrology magazine in the 1940's, and then
a few more in the 1950's, when in 1953 he began a monthly series in
that magazine called Solunars, which he wrote until his death. This
series, more than any other effort, disseminated the sidereal zodiac
throughout the American astrological commuity via the huge readership
of American Astrology magazine. He had other plans, but as happens so often when the task for which one is intended is completed (here with the publication of Astrological Origins), his body began to fail him. Cyril suffered a heart attack and died 5 A.M. Mountain Standard Time on January 5th, 1970 at Tuscon Arizona. His influence in the sidereal community is still pervasive, however, and the work goes on; and it is still fought tooth and nail by tropicalists who refuse to accept that the constellations are legitimate purveyors of astrological influence except as individual stars. While many have contended that both ways of reckoning the zodiac are true, a close examination of the material makes clear that you can't have it both ways. One of them is a fraud. *******
|
*******